From wixomlawoffice at gmail.com  Mon Apr  8 11:54:58 2013
From: wixomlawoffice at gmail.com (Rocky Wixom)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:54:58 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
Message-ID: <CAHMFHSEp8myOuEBv_USa8t3wOOMSQ7QYpNg2nW4Una-AHnPGWA@mail.gmail.com>

H
ere are the facts:

Client sees a national law firm commercial and believes he may have a
personal injury claim for damages for taking a prescription drug.

 He contacts the firm, they screen it and send him a letter saying his
statute of limitations is run and there is no claim.

TWO YEARS LATER he files a chapter 7.  Because the law firm said there was
no claim he did not disclose the issue in any way to the Court or Trustee.
His no asset case closes in approximately 3 months from the petition.  I
never withdrew from the case.  I never withdraw from closed cases.

3 months after the case closed the national law firm re-evaluated cases of
his type and reached out to him to reopen the PI case  Turns out he is now
entitled to a very substantial recovery.

Not long ago the law firm called me and informed me of these facts which is
when I learned of any of this for the first time.

Question:

1) Because my client was told by a firm two years prior to filing that he
did not have a claim I do not believe he has any issues with bankruptcy
fraud, yet.  The firm has admitted that they originally told him he had no
case.   Am I wrong?


2) Isn't this an undisclosed contingent and unliquidated claim that existed
at the time of the bankruptcy despite the national law firms advice to the
contrary?  Thus isn't it property of the estate subject only to a PI
exemption to the extent reasonably necessary for support?

3) If so doesn't my client have a duty to re-open and list the asset and
claim any exemption?  Probably have to negotiate a compromise settlement?

3) what is the test for reasonably necessary for support of my client and
his minor children?

4) what if my client says he does not want to re list and bring to the
trustee's attention?
As the attorney of record in a closed case do I have a duty to re-open and
withdraw from the case without disclosing to the trustee what my client is
doing?  Or does the fact that it is closed mean I can walk away and let my
client run the risk of bankruptcy fraud for not allowing me to re-open and
disclose?

any thoughts would be appreciated.






-- 
Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
(208) 542-5298

Wixom Law Office, Inc.
PO Box 51334
Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405

The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.

From ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com  Mon Apr  8 14:40:00 2013
From: ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com (Aaron Tolson)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:40:00 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
In-Reply-To: <CAHMFHSEp8myOuEBv_USa8t3wOOMSQ7QYpNg2nW4Una-AHnPGWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHMFHSEp8myOuEBv_USa8t3wOOMSQ7QYpNg2nW4Una-AHnPGWA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJy6kP7pYP2V8t5nmXe9ANN3XFNinhbT1JGXzFPUinNU4Awtiw@mail.gmail.com>

I have had a couple similar things and I think you have to reopen and
administer.  I think the current state of the case law is that if you don't
run it through bankruptcy, there is an absolute defense to the malpractice
case (see recent case McAllister v. Dixon, 2013 Opinion 16 Idaho Supreme
Court.)  I do malpractice panel hearings and that is coming up as a defense
more than you might think.  So it might help you with your client to
explain that they may not even get a recovery if they don't reopen.   It is
a pretty easy thing to do that I can send you the forms if you need to I
just did a case that is with Mr. Hopkins.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Rocky Wixom <wixomlawoffice at gmail.com>wrote:

> H
> ere are the facts:
>
> Client sees a national law firm commercial and believes he may have a
> personal injury claim for damages for taking a prescription drug.
>
>  He contacts the firm, they screen it and send him a letter saying his
> statute of limitations is run and there is no claim.
>
> TWO YEARS LATER he files a chapter 7.  Because the law firm said there was
> no claim he did not disclose the issue in any way to the Court or Trustee.
> His no asset case closes in approximately 3 months from the petition.  I
> never withdrew from the case.  I never withdraw from closed cases.
>
> 3 months after the case closed the national law firm re-evaluated cases of
> his type and reached out to him to reopen the PI case  Turns out he is now
> entitled to a very substantial recovery.
>
> Not long ago the law firm called me and informed me of these facts which is
> when I learned of any of this for the first time.
>
> Question:
>
> 1) Because my client was told by a firm two years prior to filing that he
> did not have a claim I do not believe he has any issues with bankruptcy
> fraud, yet.  The firm has admitted that they originally told him he had no
> case.   Am I wrong?
>
>
> 2) Isn't this an undisclosed contingent and unliquidated claim that existed
> at the time of the bankruptcy despite the national law firms advice to the
> contrary?  Thus isn't it property of the estate subject only to a PI
> exemption to the extent reasonably necessary for support?
>
> 3) If so doesn't my client have a duty to re-open and list the asset and
> claim any exemption?  Probably have to negotiate a compromise settlement?
>
> 3) what is the test for reasonably necessary for support of my client and
> his minor children?
>
> 4) what if my client says he does not want to re list and bring to the
> trustee's attention?
> As the attorney of record in a closed case do I have a duty to re-open and
> withdraw from the case without disclosing to the trustee what my client is
> doing?  Or does the fact that it is closed mean I can walk away and let my
> client run the risk of bankruptcy fraud for not allowing me to re-open and
> disclose?
>
> any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
> (208) 542-5298
>
> Wixom Law Office, Inc.
> PO Box 51334
> Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405
>
> The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
> attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
> only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
> contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>



-- 
Aaron J. Tolson
2677 E. 17th St. #300
Ammon, ID. 83406
208-228-5221

This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
error.

From ford at ejame.com  Mon Apr  8 15:04:56 2013
From: ford at ejame.com (Ford Elsaesser)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:04:56 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
In-Reply-To: <CAJy6kP7pYP2V8t5nmXe9ANN3XFNinhbT1JGXzFPUinNU4Awtiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHMFHSEp8myOuEBv_USa8t3wOOMSQ7QYpNg2nW4Una-AHnPGWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJy6kP7pYP2V8t5nmXe9ANN3XFNinhbT1JGXzFPUinNU4Awtiw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3996556F8B2F8040ABBD7B56935D500E13901FE6@EJAMEDC.ejame.local>

Reopen case;schedule the claim;make a deal with trustee on split of eventual proceeds -or-the court prefers-claim the exemption and put the trustees objection to ex. On hold pending settlement-ford

-----Original Message-----
From: CLBS [mailto:clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov] On Behalf Of Aaron Tolson
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:40 PM
To: Rocky Wixom
Cc: clbs
Subject: Re: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed

I have had a couple similar things and I think you have to reopen and administer.  I think the current state of the case law is that if you don't run it through bankruptcy, there is an absolute defense to the malpractice case (see recent case McAllister v. Dixon, 2013 Opinion 16 Idaho Supreme
Court.)  I do malpractice panel hearings and that is coming up as a defense more than you might think.  So it might help you with your client to
explain that they may not even get a recovery if they don't reopen.   It is
a pretty easy thing to do that I can send you the forms if you need to I just did a case that is with Mr. Hopkins.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Rocky Wixom <wixomlawoffice at gmail.com>wrote:

> H
> ere are the facts:
>
> Client sees a national law firm commercial and believes he may have a 
> personal injury claim for damages for taking a prescription drug.
>
>  He contacts the firm, they screen it and send him a letter saying his 
> statute of limitations is run and there is no claim.
>
> TWO YEARS LATER he files a chapter 7.  Because the law firm said there 
> was no claim he did not disclose the issue in any way to the Court or Trustee.
> His no asset case closes in approximately 3 months from the petition.  
> I never withdrew from the case.  I never withdraw from closed cases.
>
> 3 months after the case closed the national law firm re-evaluated 
> cases of his type and reached out to him to reopen the PI case  Turns 
> out he is now entitled to a very substantial recovery.
>
> Not long ago the law firm called me and informed me of these facts 
> which is when I learned of any of this for the first time.
>
> Question:
>
> 1) Because my client was told by a firm two years prior to filing that 
> he did not have a claim I do not believe he has any issues with 
> bankruptcy fraud, yet.  The firm has admitted that they originally told him he had no
> case.   Am I wrong?
>
>
> 2) Isn't this an undisclosed contingent and unliquidated claim that 
> existed at the time of the bankruptcy despite the national law firms 
> advice to the contrary?  Thus isn't it property of the estate subject 
> only to a PI exemption to the extent reasonably necessary for support?
>
> 3) If so doesn't my client have a duty to re-open and list the asset 
> and claim any exemption?  Probably have to negotiate a compromise settlement?
>
> 3) what is the test for reasonably necessary for support of my client 
> and his minor children?
>
> 4) what if my client says he does not want to re list and bring to the 
> trustee's attention?
> As the attorney of record in a closed case do I have a duty to re-open 
> and withdraw from the case without disclosing to the trustee what my 
> client is doing?  Or does the fact that it is closed mean I can walk 
> away and let my client run the risk of bankruptcy fraud for not 
> allowing me to re-open and disclose?
>
> any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
> (208) 542-5298
>
> Wixom Law Office, Inc.
> PO Box 51334
> Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405
>
> The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under 
> the attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated 
> recipient only.  If you have received this message in error then 
> please delete it and contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>



--
Aaron J. Tolson
2677 E. 17th St. #300
Ammon, ID. 83406
208-228-5221

This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in error.
_______________________________________________
CLBS mailing list
CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs

From wixomlawoffice at gmail.com  Mon Apr  8 15:41:42 2013
From: wixomlawoffice at gmail.com (Rocky Wixom)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:41:42 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
In-Reply-To: <3996556F8B2F8040ABBD7B56935D500E13901FE6@EJAMEDC.ejame.local>
References: <CAHMFHSEp8myOuEBv_USa8t3wOOMSQ7QYpNg2nW4Una-AHnPGWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJy6kP7pYP2V8t5nmXe9ANN3XFNinhbT1JGXzFPUinNU4Awtiw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3996556F8B2F8040ABBD7B56935D500E13901FE6@EJAMEDC.ejame.local>
Message-ID: <CAHMFHSGV1S1BX7Fa20GJJc2BxD68sGH5XxFGjVWBjn3HX5vm_g@mail.gmail.com>

*T**hanks for the feedback everyone.  Brings up a new question.  If the
National Firm told them they had no case and my client relied upon that to
file bankruptcy doesn't the estate also have a claim for malpractice?  I
mean if he had pursued the claim I may well have been able to settle his
debts and keep him a substantial portion and avoid bankruptcy altogether?*
**


On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Ford Elsaesser <ford at ejame.com> wrote:

> Reopen case;schedule the claim;make a deal with trustee on split of
> eventual proceeds -or-the court prefers-claim the exemption and put the
> trustees objection to ex. On hold pending settlement-ford
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CLBS [mailto:clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov] On Behalf Of Aaron Tolson
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:40 PM
> To: Rocky Wixom
> Cc: clbs
> Subject: Re: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
>
> I have had a couple similar things and I think you have to reopen and
> administer.  I think the current state of the case law is that if you don't
> run it through bankruptcy, there is an absolute defense to the malpractice
> case (see recent case McAllister v. Dixon, 2013 Opinion 16 Idaho Supreme
> Court.)  I do malpractice panel hearings and that is coming up as a
> defense more than you might think.  So it might help you with your client to
> explain that they may not even get a recovery if they don't reopen.   It is
> a pretty easy thing to do that I can send you the forms if you need to I
> just did a case that is with Mr. Hopkins.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Rocky Wixom <wixomlawoffice at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > H
> > ere are the facts:
> >
> > Client sees a national law firm commercial and believes he may have a
> > personal injury claim for damages for taking a prescription drug.
> >
> >  He contacts the firm, they screen it and send him a letter saying his
> > statute of limitations is run and there is no claim.
> >
> > TWO YEARS LATER he files a chapter 7.  Because the law firm said there
> > was no claim he did not disclose the issue in any way to the Court or
> Trustee.
> > His no asset case closes in approximately 3 months from the petition.
> > I never withdrew from the case.  I never withdraw from closed cases.
> >
> > 3 months after the case closed the national law firm re-evaluated
> > cases of his type and reached out to him to reopen the PI case  Turns
> > out he is now entitled to a very substantial recovery.
> >
> > Not long ago the law firm called me and informed me of these facts
> > which is when I learned of any of this for the first time.
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > 1) Because my client was told by a firm two years prior to filing that
> > he did not have a claim I do not believe he has any issues with
> > bankruptcy fraud, yet.  The firm has admitted that they originally told
> him he had no
> > case.   Am I wrong?
> >
> >
> > 2) Isn't this an undisclosed contingent and unliquidated claim that
> > existed at the time of the bankruptcy despite the national law firms
> > advice to the contrary?  Thus isn't it property of the estate subject
> > only to a PI exemption to the extent reasonably necessary for support?
> >
> > 3) If so doesn't my client have a duty to re-open and list the asset
> > and claim any exemption?  Probably have to negotiate a compromise
> settlement?
> >
> > 3) what is the test for reasonably necessary for support of my client
> > and his minor children?
> >
> > 4) what if my client says he does not want to re list and bring to the
> > trustee's attention?
> > As the attorney of record in a closed case do I have a duty to re-open
> > and withdraw from the case without disclosing to the trustee what my
> > client is doing?  Or does the fact that it is closed mean I can walk
> > away and let my client run the risk of bankruptcy fraud for not
> > allowing me to re-open and disclose?
> >
> > any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
> > (208) 542-5298
> >
> > Wixom Law Office, Inc.
> > PO Box 51334
> > Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405
> >
> > The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under
> > the attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated
> > recipient only.  If you have received this message in error then
> > please delete it and contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298
> immediately.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CLBS mailing list
> > CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> > http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron J. Tolson
> 2677 E. 17th St. #300
> Ammon, ID. 83406
> 208-228-5221
>
> This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
> error.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>



-- 
Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
(208) 542-5298

Wixom Law Office, Inc.
PO Box 51334
Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405

The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.

From rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com  Tue Apr  9 08:50:57 2013
From: rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com (rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:50:57 -0400
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed
Message-ID: <380-22013429145057320@M2W137.mail2web.com>

see  18 U.S.C.A. ? 152(1)
I'm just sayin'...

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Rocky Wixom wixomlawoffice at gmail.com
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:54:58 -0600
To: clbs at admws.idaho.gov
Subject: [CLBS] PI claim awarded after a Chapter 7 closed


H
ere are the facts:

Client sees a national law firm commercial and believes he may have a
personal injury claim for damages for taking a prescription drug.

 He contacts the firm, they screen it and send him a letter saying his
statute of limitations is run and there is no claim.

TWO YEARS LATER he files a chapter 7.  Because the law firm said there was
no claim he did not disclose the issue in any way to the Court or Trustee.
His no asset case closes in approximately 3 months from the petition.  I
never withdrew from the case.  I never withdraw from closed cases.

3 months after the case closed the national law firm re-evaluated cases of
his type and reached out to him to reopen the PI case  Turns out he is now
entitled to a very substantial recovery.

Not long ago the law firm called me and informed me of these facts which is
when I learned of any of this for the first time.

Question:

1) Because my client was told by a firm two years prior to filing that he
did not have a claim I do not believe he has any issues with bankruptcy
fraud, yet.  The firm has admitted that they originally told him he had no
case.   Am I wrong?


2) Isn't this an undisclosed contingent and unliquidated claim that existed
at the time of the bankruptcy despite the national law firms advice to the
contrary?  Thus isn't it property of the estate subject only to a PI
exemption to the extent reasonably necessary for support?

3) If so doesn't my client have a duty to re-open and list the asset and
claim any exemption?  Probably have to negotiate a compromise settlement?

3) what is the test for reasonably necessary for support of my client and
his minor children?

4) what if my client says he does not want to re list and bring to the
trustee's attention?
As the attorney of record in a closed case do I have a duty to re-open and
withdraw from the case without disclosing to the trustee what my client is
doing?  Or does the fact that it is closed mean I can walk away and let my
client run the risk of bankruptcy fraud for not allowing me to re-open and
disclose?

any thoughts would be appreciated.






-- 
Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
(208) 542-5298

Wixom Law Office, Inc.
PO Box 51334
Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405

The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.
_______________________________________________
CLBS mailing list
CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com ? Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft?
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



From gugino at cableone.net  Tue Apr  9 09:00:56 2013
From: gugino at cableone.net (Jeremy Gugino)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:00:56 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Documents from QuikDocs for Case: 12-02533 (WOLFE,
	MICHAEL ERIC)
Message-ID: <004901ce3533$0a8a40c0$1f9ec240$@cableone.net>

Folks:

This is a follow-up to a case I mentioned at the Bankruptcy Seminar in
McCall.  It has to do with turnover actions against debtors.  I was unable
to talk very much about it then because it was under advisement.  The
decision just came down yesterday.

Jeremy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ECF_DOC_39_18896702.PDF
Type: application/pdf
Size: 204824 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130409/10d794f4/attachment-0001.pdf>

From dbc at dbclarklaw.com  Tue Apr  9 09:07:45 2013
From: dbc at dbclarklaw.com (D. Blair Clark)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:07:45 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Documents from QuikDocs for Case: 12-02533 (WOLFE,
	MICHAEL ERIC)
In-Reply-To: <004901ce3533$0a8a40c0$1f9ec240$@cableone.net>
References: <004901ce3533$0a8a40c0$1f9ec240$@cableone.net>
Message-ID: <098701ce3533$fdc03740$f940a5c0$@com>

Did you pursue it later under 549?  

D. Blair Clark
LAW OFFICES OF D. BLAIR CLARK PLLC
1513 Tyrell Lane, Suite 130
Boise, ID 83706
Telephone:    (208) 475-2050
Fax:               (208) 475-2055



-----Original Message-----
From: CLBS [mailto:clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov] On Behalf Of Jeremy Gugino
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 9:01 AM
To: 'Bankruptcy list'
Subject: [CLBS] Documents from QuikDocs for Case: 12-02533 (WOLFE, MICHAEL
ERIC)

Folks:

This is a follow-up to a case I mentioned at the Bankruptcy Seminar in
McCall.  It has to do with turnover actions against debtors.  I was unable
to talk very much about it then because it was under advisement.  The
decision just came down yesterday.

Jeremy



From cjlaw at cableone.net  Wed Apr 10 17:46:00 2013
From: cjlaw at cableone.net (Charles Johnson)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:46:00 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Oregon Eviction Notices and Forms
Message-ID: <000b01ce3645$8f4ca010$ade5e030$@net>

 

Dear fellow CLBS members,

 

               If one of you has a good set of simple Oregon Eviction Notices and Forms I would appreciate you forwarding me a copy.  Thanks,

 

Charles Johnson

JOHNSON OLSON CHARTERED                           

419 West Benton

P.O. Box 1725

Pocatello, Idaho  83204-1725

Telephone: (208) 232-7926

Facsimile: (208) 232-9161

E-Mail:  <mailto:cjlaw at allidaho.com> cjlaw at cableone.net

ISB No. 2464


From gugino at cableone.net  Fri Apr 12 11:23:29 2013
From: gugino at cableone.net (Jeremy Gugino)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:23:29 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Emailing:
	Zazzall%20v.%20Goldsmith%20-%2012b7%20and%2012c%20FINAL.pdf
Message-ID: <00b901ce37a2$74a4cc70$5dee6550$@cableone.net>

Folks:

 

For anyone following the DBSI litigation, attached is a brand new Idaho BK
Court decision.  While the decision deals with (yet another) failed Rule 12
motion, the fact section gives a good snap-shot of what DBSI has been
accused of doing.  Also, for the first time in Idaho Bankruptcy history, the
word "compendious" is used in a written opinion (at least as far as I can
tell).  Enjoy.

 

Jeremy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Zazzall%20v.%20Goldsmith%20-%2012b7%20and%2012c%20FINAL.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 69567 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130412/e0adce4b/attachment-0001.pdf>

From reynardtrustee at gmail.com  Fri Apr 12 14:58:30 2013
From: reynardtrustee at gmail.com (Janine Reynard)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:58:30 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Fwd: CH 11 341 meetings notice
In-Reply-To: <2E3567102AAE16439DD3CF380B1D33E6177E87FEB8@UST00EOMAILVS.ust.doj.gov>
References: <2E3567102AAE16439DD3CF380B1D33E6177E87FEB8@UST00EOMAILVS.ust.doj.gov>
Message-ID: <CAL+4588AZbCSMji-A-rw953+_QQmVcSF83s9+LODNt6qpRULFQ@mail.gmail.com>

Please see email below from David Newman, AUST

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newman, David W. (USTP) <David.W.Newman at usdoj.gov>
Date: Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:03 PM
Subject: CH 11 341 meetings notice
To: "Janine Reynard (reynardtrustee at gmail.com)" <reynardtrustee at gmail.com>



Please take notice that due to budgetary issues, the United States Trustee
is changing the customary locations and schedules for chapter 11 meetings
of creditors under 11 U.S.C. ?  341.  A flexible approach will be used to
minimize the impacts on debtors and other parties in interest.   These
changes are effective for any chapter 11 cases filed on or after April 15,
2013.  Some chapter 11 meetings of creditors under 11 U.S.C. ?  341 may be
conducted on regular business days other than Fridays.  Meetings of
creditors for chapter 11 cases assigned to the Pocatello Division of the
Bankruptcy Court may be conducted in Pocatello or Jerome.   Meetings of
creditors for chapter 11 cases assigned to the South Central Calendar
(Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding, Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka, and Twin Falls
counties) may be conducted in Jerome or Boise.  Meetings of creditors for
chapter 11 cases assigned to the Moscow Division will be conducted in Coeur
d'Alene.  Meetings of creditors for chapter 11 cases assigned to the Boise
Division will continue to be held in Boise.  Meetings of creditors for
chapter 11 cases assigned to the Coeur d' Alene Division will continue to
be held in Coeur d' Alene.   These changes will remain in force until
further notice.  The locations and schedules of meetings of creditors for
cases under chapters other than chapter 11 are unchanged.  Further
information about the locations of meetings of creditors can be found at
http://www.justice.gov/ust/r18/boise/341_meeting.htm





Respectfully,

David W. Newman
United States Department of Justice
Assistant United States Trustee
District of Idaho

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
intended addressee and may contain privileged and/or "Limited Official Use"
/ "Sensitive But Unclassified" information. If the reader of the message is
not the intended recipient(s) or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
e-mail message or by telephone at (208) 334-1300, and delete the message
and any attachments from your system. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 7142 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130412/6ad29917/attachment.bin>

From alex at kam13trustee.com  Mon Apr 15 21:12:04 2013
From: alex at kam13trustee.com (Alexandra Caval)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:12:04 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] title loans and lines 28/29 on the Means Test
Message-ID: <b1988bcfd2ac4105801ed6541198ec4d@BL2PR08MB004.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>

For those of you that routinely deal with the Means Test, please see the attached - it deals with title loans and the ownership deduction on lines 28/29 of the 22C. I know this issue is coming up in a few cases of mine recently.

Alexandra O. Caval
Staff Attorney
Office of Kathleen A. McCallister
Chapter 13 Trustee
P.O. Box 1150
Meridian, ID 83680
T: (208) 922-5100
F: (208) 922-5599
alex at kam13trustee.com<mailto:alex at kam13trustee.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: In re Carroll.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 169098 bytes
Desc: In re Carroll.pdf
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130416/a8e4a9c9/attachment-0001.pdf>

From ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com  Tue Apr 16 12:48:47 2013
From: ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com (Aaron Tolson)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:48:47 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Clients getting mortgage foreclosure checks
Message-ID: <CAJy6kP6vaLyQdfXg0XjBxcyuUJZvDhm83OFqPFT4RQrrPsJ=6A@mail.gmail.com>

As part of the settlement the government is starting to send checks to my
clients for their suffering in wrongful foreclosures, often which were in
bankruptcy, and so far all in closed cases, and for a few hundred dollars.
My clients are asking if it is legit, and if they can keep the money.
Online it appears there were legit DOJ enforcement actions consistent with
this, but also some related scamming going on.  Is anyone aware if the US
Trustee, the Trustees, or in general what the plan is here?

-- 
Aaron J. Tolson
2677 E. 17th St. #300
Ammon, ID. 83406
208-228-5221

This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
error.

From rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com  Tue Apr 16 15:23:33 2013
From: rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com (rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:23:33 -0400
Subject: [CLBS] Clients getting mortgage foreclosure checks
Message-ID: <380-220134216212333420@M2W142.mail2web.com>


Plan #1 is report it to the trustee in the BK case.


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Aaron Tolson ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:48:47 -0600
To: clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov, clbs at admws.idaho.gov
Subject: [CLBS] Clients getting mortgage foreclosure checks


As part of the settlement the government is starting to send checks to my
clients for their suffering in wrongful foreclosures, often which were in
bankruptcy, and so far all in closed cases, and for a few hundred dollars.
My clients are asking if it is legit, and if they can keep the money.
Online it appears there were legit DOJ enforcement actions consistent with
this, but also some related scamming going on.  Is anyone aware if the US
Trustee, the Trustees, or in general what the plan is here?

-- 
Aaron J. Tolson
2677 E. 17th St. #300
Ammon, ID. 83406
208-228-5221

This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
error.
_______________________________________________
CLBS mailing list
CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - Microsoft? Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



From ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com  Tue Apr 16 15:31:46 2013
From: ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com (Aaron Tolson)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:31:46 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Clients getting mortgage foreclosure checks
In-Reply-To: <380-220134216212333420@M2W142.mail2web.com>
References: <380-220134216212333420@M2W142.mail2web.com>
Message-ID: <CAJy6kP4OGO16C9UwZhg_iFv=mddTwT=v+LpGitQEqd4BBPa7Nw@mail.gmail.com>

yes done that. I think it is just starting to happen and I want to see if
there is a uniform way they want these handled so we don't end up with a
mess for people.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:23 PM, rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com <
rgreenwood at greenwoodlaw.com> wrote:

>
> Plan #1 is report it to the trustee in the BK case.
>
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Aaron Tolson ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:48:47 -0600
> To: clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov, clbs at admws.idaho.gov
> Subject: [CLBS] Clients getting mortgage foreclosure checks
>
>
> As part of the settlement the government is starting to send checks to my
> clients for their suffering in wrongful foreclosures, often which were in
> bankruptcy, and so far all in closed cases, and for a few hundred dollars.
> My clients are asking if it is legit, and if they can keep the money.
> Online it appears there were legit DOJ enforcement actions consistent with
> this, but also some related scamming going on.  Is anyone aware if the US
> Trustee, the Trustees, or in general what the plan is here?
>
> --
> Aaron J. Tolson
> 2677 E. 17th St. #300
> Ammon, ID. 83406
> 208-228-5221
>
> This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
> error.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web.com - Microsoft? Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
> http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange
>
>
>


-- 
Aaron J. Tolson
2677 E. 17th St. #300
Ammon, ID. 83406
208-228-5221

This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
error.

From reynardtrustee at gmail.com  Wed Apr 17 09:43:59 2013
From: reynardtrustee at gmail.com (Janine Reynard)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:43:59 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Fwd: REQUEST
In-Reply-To: <2E3567102AAE16439DD3CF380B1D33E617805CCB65@UST00EOMAILVS.ust.doj.gov>
References: <2E3567102AAE16439DD3CF380B1D33E617805CCB65@UST00EOMAILVS.ust.doj.gov>
Message-ID: <CAL+458-k8B46iD9UWs=xmevRB3+YwyyZzQBSWdj1=X-OSdd5Dw@mail.gmail.com>

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE JOB OPENING IN IDAHO -- PLEASE SEE BELOW

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newman, David W. (USTP) <David.W.Newman at usdoj.gov>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:13 AM
Subject: REQUEST
To: "Janine Reynard (reynardtrustee at gmail.com)" <reynardtrustee at gmail.com>


Janine, would you please have this posted to the list-serve?  Thank you.

The United States Trustee seeks resumes from persons wishing to be
considered for appointment to the panel of trustees who administer cases
filed under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The appointment is for cases
filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho,
(Ada, Adams, Boise, Canyon, Elmore, Gem, Owyhee, Payette, Valley,
Washington (and referred Malheur County, Oregon cases)).  Chapter 7
trustees receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses, in each case
in which they serve, pursuant to court order under 11 U.S.C. ? 326 and ?
330.

The minimum qualifications for appointment as a panel trustee are set forth
in 28 C.F.R. ? 58.3. To be eligible for appointment, an applicant must
possess strong administrative, financial, and interpersonal skills.
Fiduciary and bankruptcy experience is desirable but not mandatory.

A successful applicant will be required to undergo a background check and
must qualify to be bonded. Although chapter 7 trustees are not federal
employees, appointments are made consistent with federal Equal Opportunity
policies, which prohibit discrimination in employment.

Forward resumes to the applicable addresses listed below.  All resumes
should be received on or before the due date(s) indicated below.

Due Date: June 14, 2013
Forward Resumes to:
Office of the United States Trustee
ATTN: Barbara Mitchell
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5103
Seattle, WA 98101
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6016 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130417/569e4a02/attachment.bin>

From michael.pope.esq at gmail.com  Wed Apr 17 09:46:45 2013
From: michael.pope.esq at gmail.com (Michael Pope)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:46:45 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Please Remove my E-mail Address from the CLBS Mailing List
Message-ID: <CA+VJPdh643AB4_4GemF4WRfPWCrRfwnr+sSmcesxwd5_qgviHA@mail.gmail.com>

Good Morning,

I am no longer a member of the CLBS Section of the Idaho Bar.  I am no
longer in need of the e-mails sent by the other members.  Please remove my
e-mail address from the Mailing List so I do not receive e-mails from the
Section or other members in the future.

Thank you,

Michael A. Pope

From gugino at cableone.net  Wed Apr 17 11:44:39 2013
From: gugino at cableone.net (Jeremy Gugino)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:44:39 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Trustee opening
Message-ID: <006d01ce3b93$3d69fab0$b83df010$@cableone.net>

Folks:

 

Yes, the rumors are true.  The job posting that was sent out earlier is for
my position.  Anyone who wishes to inquire about the job can feel free to
call me at 342-1590.  If you wish to meet in person to talk about the
opening after hours, I prefer the bar at Chandler's and I'm partial to
Dewar'sJ

 

Jeremy 


From Tyler at twinfallsattorneys.com  Wed Apr 17 14:33:24 2013
From: Tyler at twinfallsattorneys.com (Tyler McGee)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:33:24 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] Non DSO debt to a former spouse
Message-ID: <68A314F324C1BD41873F05A36DE1AE34118DC552@MBX023-W1-CA-2.exch023.domain.local>

I know there has been some good discussion on non-DSO [523(a)(15)] debts on the listserve in the past, but I cannot find any guidance on my issue. Here is the scenario: 

H and W are divorced, in connection with the divorce and property settlement, W is granted a money judgment against H. H files chapter 7 bankruptcy. The only debt that H lists in his bankruptcy is the debt owed to W. W comes in to my office thinking she is out of luck and I show her that non-DSO debts incurred in a divorce are non-dischargeable under 523(a)(15). Based upon the fact that the only debt listed is the debt from H to W, I assume that H and his attorney do not consider the debt to be non-dischargeable (or a mistake was made.) 

So here are my questions, keep in mind that I am usually not batting for the creditors' team, so I feel a little out of place. 

1 - A creditor must file an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of any debt under section 523(a)(2), (4) or (6), it would seem that 523 (a)(15) debts survive discharge without a determination in an adversary proceeding. Is there any restriction on filing a complaint to determine non-dischargability on a 523(a)(15) complaint? 

2 - Would it be a good idea to file such a complaint while the bankruptcy is open? The reason to do this would be to have the fight now, rather than have the fight later, and risk sanctions for violating the discharge injunction.

3 - Would it be better to just file a motion for relief from the automatic stay claiming that this debt is non-dischargeable?

4 - Does anybody have a form for a Complaint Determining Nondischargeability that they would be willing to share?

Thanks.


Tyler J. McGee

ROY, NIELSON, BARINI-GARCIA & PLATTS
P.O. Box 487
Twin Falls, Idaho 83303-0487
Phone: (208) 734-4450
Fax:? (208) 734-4452





From wixomlawoffice at gmail.com  Thu Apr 18 10:03:44 2013
From: wixomlawoffice at gmail.com (Rocky Wixom)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:03:44 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] UCC
Message-ID: <CAHMFHSF=1XKU3e9=Cv68=69qaE3+yiO+f8M5_3ggzieWz_uu1g@mail.gmail.com>

Who on the listserv has significant background in the Idaho UCC that might
be willing to give me a few minutes on the phone to point me in the right
direction for research?

-- 
Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
(208) 542-5298

Wixom Law Office, Inc.
PO Box 51334
Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405

The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.

From will at williamthelawyer.com  Thu Apr 18 10:12:53 2013
From: will at williamthelawyer.com (William J. O'Connor)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:12:53 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] UCC
In-Reply-To: <CAHMFHSF=1XKU3e9=Cv68=69qaE3+yiO+f8M5_3ggzieWz_uu1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHMFHSF=1XKU3e9=Cv68=69qaE3+yiO+f8M5_3ggzieWz_uu1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8CFC216B-3CFA-45D4-99B8-8566E27F6C74@williamthelawyer.com>

The UCC is a rather large area of law.  Do you have a specific area of the UCC that your issue involves?

William J. O'Connor
O'Connor Law, PLLC
355 West Myrtle Street 
Suite 100
Boise, ID 83702

Office:  208-344-5095
Fax: 208-424-3100

On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Rocky Wixom <wixomlawoffice at gmail.com> wrote:

> Who on the listserv has significant background in the Idaho UCC that might
> be willing to give me a few minutes on the phone to point me in the right
> direction for research?
> 
> -- 
> Rocky L. Wixom, Attorney at Law
> (208) 542-5298
> 
> Wixom Law Office, Inc.
> PO Box 51334
> Idaho Falls, Idaho  83405
> 
> The contents of this message and any attachments are protected under the
> attorney-client privilege and are intended for the designated recipient
> only.  If you have received this message in error then please delete it and
> contact Wixom Law Office at (208) 542-5298 immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs


From katied at nctv.com  Thu Apr 18 12:07:14 2013
From: katied at nctv.com (Catherine Dullea)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:07:14 -0700
Subject: [CLBS] 2014 Seminar
Message-ID: <48EB0115F08B4487BDBF888945EF3379@katied>

Dear Listmates:
I will be organizing the 2014 Winter Bankruptcy Seminar.  It will be held in
Coeur d'Alene, most likely at the Resort.  I should be able to publish dates
fairly soon.  I have reviewed the comments from the McCall seminar this year
and am taking them into consideration regarding topics, speakers, physical
set-up and the banquet.  I want to know what people want to learn about next
year.  Please email me suggestions or requests regarding speakers and topics
you'd like to see.  I think I have a pretty good understanding of what
didn't work with the meeting room, banquet and overlapping with breakout
sessions in McCall.    
Thank you,
Katie Dullea
katied at nctv.com
 
 
 
 

From mtc at Angstman.com  Mon Apr 22 09:22:59 2013
From: mtc at Angstman.com (Matthew T. Christensen)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:22:59 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Charles Schwab
Message-ID: <77846F147B6E0148A950F1D952A4480201F6039D@hades.dynasty.angstman.com>

Anyone out there regularly represent Charles Schwab, and willing to receive a copy of a demand letter to the company?

 

MTC



 

Matthew T. Christensen

Attorney and Counselor at Law

 

ANGSTMAN JOHNSON 

Attorneys and Counselors

3649 N. Lakeharbor Lane

Boise, Idaho  83703

(208) 384-8588

(208) 853-0117 (fax)

mtc at angstman.com <mailto:mtc at angstman.com> 

www.angstman.com <http://www.angstman.com> 

 

 

NOTICE: This electronic transmission (and/or the documents accompanying it) may contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?? 2510 and 2521 and may be legally privileged.  This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify Angstman Johnson immediately by telephone (208-384-8588) and destroy the original message.  Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.  If you are the intended recipient, you acknowledge that the email address being utilized is secure and that there will not be a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or breach of any duty of confidentiality by the sender's correspondence to that email address.

 


From alex at kam13trustee.com  Mon Apr 22 11:43:09 2013
From: alex at kam13trustee.com (Alexandra Caval)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:43:09 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] Attorney for Capital One Auto Finance
Message-ID: <f6d1eea739514d9bb15a07e01e4eb3ba@BL2PR08MB004.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Does anyone know who represents Capital One Auto Finance here locally?

Alexandra O. Caval
Staff Attorney
Office of Kathleen A. McCallister
Chapter 13 Trustee
P.O. Box 1150
Meridian, ID 83680
T: (208) 922-5100
F: (208) 922-5599
alex at kam13trustee.com<mailto:alex at kam13trustee.com>


From Suzanne_Hickok at id.uscourts.gov  Tue Apr 23 11:23:03 2013
From: Suzanne_Hickok at id.uscourts.gov (Suzanne_Hickok at id.uscourts.gov)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:23:03 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] ECF access
Message-ID: <OF6E3EE1B1.0BFB8EFB-ON87257B56.005F61F5-87257B56.005F83D0@uscmail.uscourts.gov>

____________________________________________________________________________

Please be advised that the District of Idaho?s Bankruptcy Court Electronic 
Case Filing (ECF) system, and the Public Access to Court Electronic 
Records (PACER) system will be offline this Saturday, April 27th from 8:00 
AM to 5:00 PM (MST).  During this time you will not be able to view or 
file documents.  Access to both ECF and PACER will be restored on 
Saturday, April 27 shortly after 5:00 PM (MST). 

The Clerk's Office will also implement a new version of ECF on May 1st. 
For more information on the new features, please visit the follow link:  
http://www.id.uscourts.gov/announcements/Idaho5.1ChangesLtrEXTERNAL.pdf



James M. Kim
Chief Deputy of Operations
U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts
james_kim at id.uscourts.gov
(208) 334-9464

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130423/7fafea4a/attachment-0001.jpe>

From denny at andrewslaw.info  Tue Apr 23 11:45:27 2013
From: denny at andrewslaw.info (Denton Andrews)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:45:27 -0700
Subject: [CLBS] Where's My Refund    IRS web site
Message-ID: <mailman.0.1366739127.1070.clbs@admws.idaho.gov>

The subject site is used by Trustees to determine when debtors are receiving
refunds. I have cases where the refunds have been received by the debtors
before filing (it shows up on the bank statement), yet the IRS site says the
refund is still pending. Has anyone had this come up? 
 
This email is intended to be confidential, and is intended only for the
addressee. If you have received this message in error, you may not copy or
disseminate the information in this email nor use it for any purpose. Please
contact us immediately at the telephone number above or reply to this email
to notify us of any delivery errors. 

We are a federally designated Debt Relief Agency under the United States
Bankruptcy Laws. We assist people with finding solutions to their debt
problems, including, where appropriate, assisting them with the filing of
petitions for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Law Offices of Denton Andrews       Ph: 208-743-8200
111 Main Street Suite 177               Fax: 208-748-4022
Lewiston, Idaho 83501             denny at andrewslaw.info

 

From RLong at bauerandfrench.com  Tue Apr 23 12:49:59 2013
From: RLong at bauerandfrench.com (Robin Long)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:49:59 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] Co-Debtor Stay
Message-ID: <6B0969DF8D895D4BA246D75EED96FCBC01D959E6@BFSBS.BFDom.local>

Listmates:

While the code does not provide for a co-debtor stay in a chapter 11, I have found cases where a judge has granted an injunction, pursuant to their powers under ? 105.

Has anybody had any luck with this in Idaho?

Robin M. Long
BAUER & FRENCH
1501 Tyrell Lane
P.O. Box 2730
Boise, ID 83701-2730
(208) 383-0090
Fax: (208) 383-0412


From katied at nctv.com  Tue Apr 23 14:50:00 2013
From: katied at nctv.com (Catherine Dullea)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:50:00 -0700
Subject: [CLBS] Foreclosure/military service
Message-ID: <89A7DC1B08D24878A19D6B3D39C1EAE7@katied>

Listmates:
I have been asked to conduct a foreclosure against a person who is in the
National Guard, but is not deployed.  To what extent do I need to deal with
the Serviceperson's Relief Act?
--Katie Dullea
 
 
 

From gugino at cableone.net  Thu Apr 25 08:02:31 2013
From: gugino at cableone.net (Jeremy Gugino)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:02:31 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Emailing:
	Wallace%20-%20Gugino%20v%20NELMAP%20-%20Default%20Judgment%20FINAL.pdf
Message-ID: <000501ce41bd$8822a7c0$9867f740$@cableone.net>

Folks:

 

While this decision deals mainly with civil procedure issues, about halfway
through there is a discussion about the trustee's right to control closely
held entities vis a vis individual debtors.  In other words, if an
individual files for bankruptcy protection and that debtor is the sole
member/shareholder of an entity (or if the joint debtors are the sole
members/shareholders of an entity), then the trustee steps into their shoes
and may control the entity.  To the extent this concept was not already
clear, the decision spells it out.  This decision cites to Hoyle, which was
an oral decision that Matt referenced on the list serv a few weeks back.
>From a bankruptcy point of view, this is something ALL debtor's attorney's
should be cognizant of - if you bring a debtor into bankruptcy who is
expecting his or her non-debtor entity assets to be safe, you could be
setting them up for a fall.

 

Jeremy  

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Wallace%20-%20Gugino%20v%20NELMAP%20-%20Default%20Judgment%20FINAL.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 59251 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130425/cb5542f6/attachment-0001.pdf>

From gugino at cableone.net  Thu Apr 25 08:38:22 2013
From: gugino at cableone.net (Jeremy Gugino)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:38:22 -0600
Subject: [CLBS] Free money for creditors
Message-ID: <001801ce41c2$8a788c60$9f69a520$@cableone.net>

Folks:

This is a 2005  case that was reopened to administer a class action award.
Please review schedule F - your clients may have some money coming their way
if they file claims!  Please do what you can.  Thanks.

Jeremy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ECF_DOC_1_18039236.PDF
Type: application/pdf
Size: 162402 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130425/16c1ba31/attachment-0001.pdf>

From jmacdonald at ejame.com  Thu Apr 25 17:47:12 2013
From: jmacdonald at ejame.com (James Macdonald)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:47:12 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] Social Security Overpayment ?
Message-ID: <D8FD42D90818F1449D66DE24F7815A1413881025@EJAMEDC.ejame.local>

Are over payments made by Social Security dischargeable?  The research I have done says yes.  Although, I haven't found any Idaho cases addressing this issue.  Has anybody had any experience with this issue?

Regards,

James S. Macdonald

We have moved our office - please note our new physical address below:

Elsaesser Jarzabek Anderson Elliott & Macdonald, Chtd.
PO Box 1049
Lake Plaza Building - 123 South Third Avenue, Suite 24
Sandpoint, ID  83864
208.263.8517
208.263.0759 (Fax)

The information in this email message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.  If you think you received this email message in error, please reply to james at ejame.com<mailto:ford at ejame.com> or call (208) 263-8517.


From alex at kam13trustee.com  Thu Apr 25 19:31:19 2013
From: alex at kam13trustee.com (Alexandra Caval)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:31:19 +0000
Subject: [CLBS] May 15, 2013 Bankruptcy Workshop
Message-ID: <cf1784dd6b7a4e4aace20b028678f42a@BL2PR08MB004.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Everyone,

Please see the attached flyer. This workshop will cover the new Chapter 13 Plan for those of you that handle Chapter 13 cases or those of you that are considering tackling your very first Chapter 13 case (it's not that bad, I promise). Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Alexandra O. Caval
Staff Attorney
Office of Kathleen A. McCallister
Chapter 13 Trustee
P.O. Box 1150
Meridian, ID 83680
T: (208) 922-5100
F: (208) 922-5599
alex at kam13trustee.com<mailto:alex at kam13trustee.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BK Workshop.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 10431 bytes
Desc: BK Workshop.pdf
URL: <http://admws.idaho.gov/pipermail/clbs/attachments/20130426/793bd59d/attachment.pdf>