[CLBS] Chapter 20s

Gery Edson gedson at gedson.com
Fri Oct 21 14:11:54 MDT 2016


Yeah that's Nobleman

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Randy French <rfrench at rfrenchlaw.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that the issue is that your home has at least some equity to secure
> the 2nd at the time that you file the ch 13.  I do not believe that you can
> rely upon the value of the home when the ch 7 was filed or the amount of
> debt owed on the first when the ch 7 was filed.
> 
> Ch 20s are still available and lien stripping in a ch 20 is possible.  But,
> you have to be able to show that there is no equity in the property above
> the senior lien(s) to secure the 2nd.
> 
> Randy French
> 
> Law Office of Randal J. French, P.C.
> Attorneys at Law
> AP.O. Box 836 PBoise, ID 83701 B(208) 859-6881  
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments, may contain
> information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended solely
> for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. If you are NOT the
> intended recipient, you must delete this message and attachments and are
> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> message is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this email, including any
> attachment, is to be a legally binding signature.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CLBS [mailto:clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov] On Behalf Of Jon Wilson
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:33 PM
> To: clbs at admws.idaho.gov
> Subject: [CLBS] Chapter 20s
> 
> Chapter 20s are possible, but I have not had a situation where the possible
> issues is raised years after a chapter 7 was filed and discharged received
> by debtor.
> 
> 
> 
> Is it possible to file a Chapter 7 in year one and 7 years later file a
> chapter 13 to strip the 2nd DOT lien.
> 
> 
> 
> Basic facts, the 2nd was not secured by any equity when chapter 7 was filed
> in year one, debtor did not reaffirm on either the 1st or 2nd.   7 years
> later, the home has a value in excess of the 1st DOT.  It doesn't seem
> likely since the consensual lien has remained against the home and has
> subsequently increase in value.  Any thoughts, verifications, etc.  Thanks. 
> 
> 
> 
> Jon
> 
> Jon R. Wilson
> 
> Attorney at Law
> 
> 
> 
> Wilson Law Offices, P.C.
> 
> 4614 W. Emerald St.
> 
> Boise, ID 83706
> 
> Tel. (208)343-8400
> 
> Fax (208)424-5006
> 
> Email:  jon at boiselaw.org <mailto:jon at boiselaw.org> 
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The preceding message (including any attachment, if
> any) is covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
> sections 2510-2521, is CONFIDENTIAL, and may also be protected by the
> ATTORNEY/CLIENT OR  OTHER PRIVILEGE.  If you believe that this message has
> been sent to you in error, do not read any further portion of the message
> other than the remainder of this notice, please reply to the sender that you
> have received the message in error, and delete the message.  If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.  We do not waive any attorney/client or work privilege by the
> transmission of this message.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs


More information about the CLBS mailing list