[CLBS] New policy or have I just not seen this situation before regarding garnishment wages.

[Randy French]

You can also exempt earned but unpaid wages, up to $1500, under 11-605(11).
So, the max unearned wages that can be exempted is $6,0000, 75% or $4500 by
11-207,, plus $1,500, by 11-605(11).  


Thanks.
Randy French

Law Office of Randal J. French, P.C.
Attorneys at Law
P.O. Box 836 
Boise, ID 83701 
(208) 859-6881

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments, may contain
information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended solely
for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. If you are NOT the
intended recipient, you must delete this message and attachments and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this email, including any
attachment, is to be a legally binding signature.



-----Original Message-----
From: CLBS [mailto:clbs-bounces at admws.idaho.gov] On Behalf Of Sarah Bratton
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 2:10 PM
To: Jon Wilson
Cc: clbs at admws.idaho.gov
Subject: Re: [CLBS] New policy or have I just not seen this situation before
regarding garnishment wages.

Did you exempt the wages under earned but unpaid wages up to 75%? If not
then the Trustee is entitled to all of the wages paid post petition but
earned pre-petition. If you have exempted 75% of the earned but unpaid wages
then debtor owes Trustee 25% of the wages. So whether those wages are
returned to debtor and then paid to Trustee is no different than if Trustee
just keeps the garnished funds up to the unexempt 25%.

Regardless of who gets the funds, debtor or Trustee there is in fact a stay
violation. you have to consider what your clients damages are but yes a stay
violation occurred and is debtors to pursue as the creditor garnished
post-petition wages.





Sarah B. Bratton, Attorney

Bratton Law, PLLC

Idaho Partner, Upright Law


Phone (208)918-0394

1020 W. Main Street

Suite 100K

Located in the Alaska Building

in Downtown Boise

(By appointment only)


Mailing Address:

7154 W.  State St. #167

Boise, ID 83714







*PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient named and may
contain information that is confidential, privileged, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the named recipient, you
may have received this transmission in error. We ask that you immediately
notify the sender and remove this and all attached file(s) from your system.
Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of the
attorney-client or work-product privileges. You are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of any of the information
contained in this transmission if you are not the intended recipient is
prohibited and may expose you to liability.



On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Jon Wilson <jon at boiselaw.org> wrote:

> Dear List Mates,
>
>
>
> Recently had the following situation come up...
>
>
>
> Debtor's wages were being garnished at the time of filing.in fact over 
> at least a month prior to the bankruptcy filing.  Debtor files 
> bankruptcy on 1st , payday several days later, but check was still 
> garnished post-petition.  Trustee has taken the position that since 
> the wages were "earned before the bankruptcy was filed" AND the 
> payday/check was cut/paid AFTER the bankruptcy was filed, those wages 
> are property of the bankruptcy estate and will be kept by the Trustee.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts, case law, etc. which counters the Trustee's position 
> those wages earned, but paid post-petition via writ of continuous 
> garnishment filed by Creditor, are those garnished wages property of 
> the Bankruptcy Estate?
>
>
>
> If the Trustee is correct, is there a stay violation against the 
> Creditor who was garnishing the debtor's wages "post-petition" even if 
> the Trustee is allowed to keep these "wages"?
>
>
>
> Appreciate you input.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> Jon R. Wilson
>
> Attorney at Law
>
>
>
> Wilson Law Offices, P.C.
>
> 4614 W. Emerald St.
>
> Boise, ID 83706
>
> Tel. (208)343-8400
>
> Fax (208)424-5006
>
> Email:  jon at boiselaw.org <mailto:jon at boiselaw.org>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The preceding message (including any 
> attachment, if
> any) is covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
> sections 2510-2521, is CONFIDENTIAL, and may also be protected by the 
> ATTORNEY/CLIENT OR  OTHER PRIVILEGE.  If you believe that this message 
> has been sent to you in error, do not read any further portion of the 
> message other than the remainder of this notice, please reply to the 
> sender that you have received the message in error, and delete the 
> message.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
> of this communication is strictly prohibited.  We do not waive any 
> attorney/client or work privilege by the transmission of this message.  
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>
_______________________________________________
CLBS mailing list
CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs