[CLBS] Idaho Homestead extraterritoriality

Alexandra Caval alex at cavallawoffice.com
Tue Apr 7 12:31:53 MDT 2020


I doubt that removing the language in I.C. 55-1003 that tied the exemption
to the equity is going to be sufficient to reverse Capps because it doesn't
alter the definition of a homestead in I.C. 55-1001. Unless the Idaho
Supreme Court has ruled that the statute applies extraterritorially in the
last 10 years then I think Capps is still good law. That's my 2 cents. ~
Alex

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:07 PM Aaron Tolson <ajt at aaronjtolsonlaw.com>
wrote:

> I lost the Capps case on this badly for debtors 10 years ago  (10.4
> I.B.C.R. 99).  Just wondering if the new homestead law is worth a renewed
> argument on this.
>
> --
> Aaron J. Tolson
> 2677 E. 17th St. #300
> Ammon, ID. 83406
> 208-228-5221
>
> This a privileged communication.  Please advise if you received it in
> error.
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>


-- 

Alexandra O. Caval

Caval Law Office, P.C.

P.O. Box 1716

Twin Falls, ID 83303-01716

T: 208.733.2035

F: 208.733.3919

alex at cavallawoffice.com




*PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient named and may
contain information that is confidential, privileged, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the named recipient, you
may have received this transmission in error. We ask that you immediately
notify the sender and remove this and all attached file(s) from your
system. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver
of the attorney-client or work-product privileges. You are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of any of the
information contained in this transmission if you are not the intended
recipient is prohibited and may expose you to liability.


More information about the CLBS mailing list