[CLBS] enforcement of judgment against non-filing spouse.
Alexandra Caval
alex at cavallawoffice.com
Mon Dec 2 13:00:03 MST 2019
If he's still married to wife then it would be a violation of the community
discharge (524(a)(3)) for creditor to go after husband's wages because
those post-discharge wages are community property. Creditor can only go
after husband's separate property while husband is married to wife. There's
a case out there that had a line it in it, when discussing the community
discharge, that says, "Satan himself could effectively get a discharge in
bankruptcy if he was married to Snow White." Creditor could go after
Husband if he ever gets divorced from wife. (That same case says something
to the effect that Satan had best treat Snow White well because if she
would ever divorced him, she would effectively be denying his discharge).
See *In Re Costanza*, 151 B.R. 588 (Bankr. D.N.M. 1993). See also *In Re
Heilman*, 430 B.R. 213 (9th Cir. BAP 2010) for a discussion on the
community discharge. ~ Alex
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:15 PM Email Service <jaykohler at live.com> wrote:
> Facts: Creditor obtains a judgment against the husband only. The debt
> sued on was only in husband's name. Subsequently, the wife files a Chap. 7
> bankruptcy and gets a discharge. The husband does not file. Out of
> caution, the wife lists the judgment creditor in Sch. F.
>
> Question: Would it be a violation of the wife's discharge injunction for
> the judgment creditor to now proceed with garnishment of the husband's
> wages?
>
> Any thoughts, opinions or authority would be appreciated.
>
> Jay Kohler
> _______________________________________________
> CLBS mailing list
> CLBS at admws.idaho.gov
> http://admws.idaho.gov/mailman/listinfo/clbs
>
--
Alexandra O. Caval
Caval Law Office, P.C.
P.O. Box 1716
Twin Falls, ID 83303-01716
T: 208.733.2035
F: 208.733.3919
alex at cavallawoffice.com
*PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient named and may
contain information that is confidential, privileged, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the named recipient, you
may have received this transmission in error. We ask that you immediately
notify the sender and remove this and all attached file(s) from your
system. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver
of the attorney-client or work-product privileges. You are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of any of the
information contained in this transmission if you are not the intended
recipient is prohibited and may expose you to liability.
More information about the CLBS
mailing list